Ditinjau dari kerangka kerja Dinul Islam, hususnya bidang perkembangan budaya dan masyarakat manusia sebagaimana difirmankan dalam Al-Quran, maka berlangsungnya perpecahan daan peperangan di antara bangsa-bangas, suku-suku bangsa, golongan, kelompok pemikiran dll yang kini sedang berlangsung adalah suatu bukti adanya metodologi alamiyah dalam mendidik manusia untuk meningkatkan ahlaaq biologisnya ke tingkat ahlaaq mulia, di mana dengan dicapainya tingkat ahlaaq mulia kemanusiaan tersebut manusia akan dapat mewakili Tuhan di Bumi sebagaimana di firmankan dalam QS.2:30. Di samping itu gen-biologi menunjukkan berlangsungnya evolusi individual dan kelompok dalam waktu yang bersamaan secara makroskopis dan mikroskopis pada spesies manusia (homosapiens-sapiens). Proses ini akan berlangsung hingga titik jenuh tertinggi (kulminasi) psikologis sebagai model medan gaya alami yang menopang sel-sel hidup manusia kembali menurun dan melompat ke suatu kesadaran kemanusiaan yang baru sebagai wujud peningkatan ahlaaq biologisnya.
Karena itu dalam memandang hidup dan kehidupan di Bumi diperlukan keobyektifan alamiyah dan kesabaran psikologis.
From: Abdul Muiz
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 4:19 AM
To: wanita-muslimah@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [wanita-muslimah] Re: Perang, Damai, dan Perempuan
karakter orang asia selatan : India, pakistan, srilangka, bangladeh, nepal termasuk afghanistan itu sepertinya keras dan antar kelompok tidak pernah akur, mungkin kayak orang Indonesia ya ? any comments ??
--- Pada Ming, 3/10/10, kmjp47@indosat.net.id <kmjp47@indosat.net.id> menulis:
Dari: kmjp47@indosat.net.id <kmjp47@indosat.net.id>
Judul: Re: [wanita-muslimah] Re: Perang, Damai, dan Perempuan
Kepada: wanita-muslimah@yahoogroups.com
Tanggal: Minggu, 3 Oktober, 2010, 7:54 AM
Begitu simpel? Apakah kalau Taliban kembali menguasai
Afganistan nasib perempuan di san akan jadilebih bagus?
Biarkan Afgan mengatur dirinya sendiri, tetapi Afgan yang
mana? Sepanjang yang menentukan kaum laki-laki, nasib
perempuan ya akan sama saja. Itu inti dari keluhan Ann
Jones.
KM
----Original Message----
From: linadahlan@yahoo.com
Date: 03/10/2010 7:43
To: <wanita-muslimah@yahoogroups.com>
Subj: [wanita-muslimah] Re: Perang, Damai, dan Perempuan
Tentara Koalisinya cabut ajah dari Afghan dan biarkan
Afghan mengatur dirinya sendiri. Ntu kalo Ann Jones peduli
ama nasib pere di sana. Dimane-mane juga yang lemah yang
jadi korban.
http://www.antaranews.com/berita/1280125033/dokumen-
rahasia-perang-afghanistan-bocor
wassalam,
--- In wanita-muslimah@yahoogroups.com, Dwi Soegardi
<soegardi@...> wrote:
>
> Wawancara dalam acara tv Democracy Now! dengan Ann
Jones, jurnalis
> yang meliput perang Afghanistan sejak 2001:
>
> ...... war is a guy thing. Men fight with each other.
Then they sit
> down at the table, negotiate some kind of power sharing
agreement, and
> go on jockeying for that power relationship as they rule
the country.
> But all the while, they go on raping, murdering,
displacing women and
> children, so that when men end war and say, "Now we have
peace," war
> is not over for women. The war against women goes on, to
such an
> extent that today, if you look at the demographics, we
are short 60
> million women in this world who have been killed and
lost in war. (Ann
> Jones, "War Is Not Over When It's Over: Women Speak Out
from the Ruins
> of War.")
>
> Working with the International Rescue Committee, we gave
digital
> cameras to women and asked them to photograph the
blessings and the
> problems in their lives. It was really a project to
encourage them to
> begin to articulate their own situation and speak up in
their own
> villages and communities on behalf of their own
interests. And the
> women were amazing. They did fantastic work. They spoke
up very loudly
> in their own interests.
>
> And what they gave us, really, was blueprints for peace.
What they
> addressed were the problems of getting safe water,
getting safe access
> to their fields to work, getting education for their
children, getting
> healthcare, getting places for community members to
meet. In other
> words, the women are concerned about the future of their
families and
> their communities living a peaceful life. And this, it
seemed to me,
> was such important support for what the UN has been
saying for a
> decade now, that you will not get durable peace anywhere
in the world
> in the aftermath of conflict unless women are involved
every step of
> the way. And that's exactly what we are not seeing in
Afghanistan
> today.
> (Ann Jones, "War Is Not Over When It's Over: Women Speak
Out from the
> Ruins of War.")
>
> Dua hal tentang perang (dalam kasus ini perang
Afghanistan)
> 1. laki-laki berperang, perempuan jadi korban. Ketika
laki-laki
> berhenti bertikai dan duduk di meja perundingan,
> perang terhadap perempuan tidak ikut berakhir.
Penderitaan mereka
> berlanjut dan mereka tidak pernah diajak untuk
mengupayakan
> perdamaian.
>
> 2. ketika perempuan diberi kesempatan untuk bertindak,
mereka
> melakukan hal-hal luar biasa:
> - pengadaan air bersih, pembuatan jalan ke sawah/ladang,
pendidikan
> anak, kesehatan, hingga sarana untuk pertemuan
masyarakat ........
>
> Masihkah soal Perang dan Damai dipercayakan kepada laki-
laki?
>
> Baca lengkapnya (atau lihat videonya) di
> http://www.democracynow.
org/2010/9/30/ann_jones_on_war_is_not
>
> Ann Jones on "War Is Not Over When It's Over: Women and
the Unseen
> Consequences of Conflict"
>
> Ann Jones has spent much of the past nine years in
Afghanistan working
> as a journalist, photographer and humanitarian aid
worker. She has
> focused largely on the impact the war has had on the
women of
> Afghanistan. Her new book is War Is Not Over When It's
Over: Women and
> the Unseen Consequences of Conflict. [includes rush
transcript]
>
> Filed under Afghanistan
>
> Guest:
>
> Ann Jones, writer and photographer. Her new book is
titled War Is Not
> Over When It's Over: Women Speak Out from the Ruins of
War.
>
> JUAN GONZALEZ: In Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai
has unveiled a
> seventy-member peace council that the Afghan government
and the Obama
> administration hope will broach talks with the Taliban.
But human
> rights groups have criticized Karzai for including
former warlords,
> suspected drug traffickers, and Taliban fighters on the
commission.
> Rachel Reid of Human Rights Watch said, quote, "Many of
these men are
> unlikely peacemakers. There are too many names here that
Afghans will
> associate with war crimes, warlordism and corruption."
> McClatchy Newspapers reports members of the so-called
peace council
> include Abdul Rab Rasul Sayyaf, who's been implicated in
the deaths of
> thousands of civilians. Another peace council member is
Maulvi
> Qalamuddin, a former Taliban deputy minister who oversaw
the closure
> of girls' schools and the flogging of women who failed
to cover
> themselves in a burqa.
>
> AMY GOODMAN: Human rights groups have also questioned
why more Afghan
> women have not been named to the council. Of the seventy
members, just
> six are women.
> Our first guest today, Ann Jones, has spent much of the
past nine
> years in Afghanistan working as a journalist,
photographer and
> humanitarian aid worker. She's focused largely on the
impact the war
> has had on the women of Afghanistan. In 2006, Ann Jones
wrote the book
> Kabul in Winter: Life Without Peace in Afghanistan. Her
new book is
> called War Is Not Over When It's Over: Women and the
Unseen
> Consequences of Conflict. It's just been published.
> We welcome you to Democracy Now!, Ann Jones.
>
> ANN JONES: Thank you.
>
> AMY GOODMAN: Ann, first start by talking about what you
last saw in
> Afghanistan when you were thereyou're embedded in
Afghan communities,
> you're embedded in the US troopsand this latest news of
the so-called
> peace council that President Karzai has established.
>
> ANN JONES: Well, I think it's typical of what has
happened, from the
> beginning, in the exclusion of women. Women have fought
very valiantly
> to be included in peace processes, and they have gone
repeatedly to
> Karzai. And he has made promises over and over again,
but he's always
> reneged on his promises to include them in various
councils. He has
> been instrumental in implementing legislation that
really deprives
> women of rights that they are guaranteed under the
constitution. And
> to have six women on this council is just another, you
know, finger
> poke in the eye. It's a complete incident of tokenism.
And to have
> someone like Sayyaf on the council, who, as head of the
Wolesi Jurga,
> the lower house of the Parliament, is one of the chief
intimidators of
> women, is a complete insult to women.
>
> JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, one of the things that you've
mentioned in some
> of your writings, you said in one article, "Our
government complains
> that the Karzai administration is corrupt, but the
greater
> problemnever mentionedis that it is fundamentalist.
The cabinet,
> courts and Parliament are all largely controlled by men
who differ
> from the Taliban chiefly in their choice of turbans."
>
> ANN JONES: Yes, that's exactly right. And, of course,
these are the
> men that the United States put in power at the Bonn
conference. They
> were our allies all through that proxy war against the
Soviets. Our
> thinking in those old days was that any devout religious
people must
> be good allies in the fight against what we used to call
"godless
> communism." So we allied ourselves with completely the
wrong people,
> and we've stuck with them all the way through. And we
installed them
> as the government that we now support. And it partlyI
think it
> largely explains the bind that we're in now, because
we're supporting
> a government that actually stands in opposition to many
of the
> principles we pretend to be supporting.
>
> JUAN GONZALEZ: And what is the impact of this at the
village or town
> level amongon the Afghan people, in the coverage that
you've done
> over the last few years?
>
> ANN JONES: Well, in fact, change has not reached most of
the villages,
> and the Karzai government does not extend much outside
the capital.
> So, what is felt in outlying areas is more the impact of
the presence
> of foreign troops in many parts of the country. And as
you know,
> thousands upon thousands have been displaced and are
living as
> internal refugees.
>
> AMY GOODMAN: Your experience embedded in the troops in
Afghanistan,
> what it was like?
>
> ANN JONES: I was embedded in thein Kunar province on
the Pakistan
> border, the area in which so much trouble is occurring
today and in
> the last few days. And at that time, probably the most
important thing
> I learned from the commander was that he was not
fighting a war of
> counterinsurgency, as we say we are doing. He was
fighting
> conventional war, because he was being hit by a
surprising force
> coming over from Pakistan. He had served on that border
six years ago
> and never expected to face the kind of opposition he was
facing last
> summer. He had lost many men in the first weeks that he
was there.
> Meanwhile, all the public policy and press attention was
on the south,
> on Kandahar, where the US was organizing for this great
push. And the
> east was totally neglected. And as we see now, that's
where this
> problem is growing.
>
> JUAN GONZALEZ: And in your new book, War Is Not Over
When It's Over,
> what do you mean in terms of the title and what you
attempted to tell
> in terms of various wars that the United States has been
involved in?
>
> ANN JONES: What I'm trying to suggest is that war is not
what we think
> it is, when we hear all these reports about soldiers and
generals and
> strategies. War includes the whole population. War is
fought on
> civilian ground. And in all modern wars, civilians are
the primary
> casualties of war, much more so than soldiers. And we
ignore that
> completely.
> Also, war is a guy thing. Men fight with each other.
Then they sit
> down at the table, negotiate some kind of power sharing
agreement, and
> go on jockeying for that power relationship as they rule
the country.
> But all the while, they go on raping, murdering,
displacing women and
> children, so that when men end war and say, "Now we have
peace," war
> is not over for women. The war against women goes on, to
such an
> extent that today, if you look at the demographics, we
are short 60
> million women in this world who have been killed and
lost in war.
>
> AMY GOODMAN: Give us examples in the different places
you have covered.
>
> ANN JONES: Well, for example, the Congo, which is very
much in the
> news now, where mass rape has been used as a technique
of war for
> years now, for a decade or more. And thousands of women
are raped over
> and over again, gang raped, not merely to persecute the
women, but to
> disrupt families, to disrupt villages, to displace whole
populations,
> so that the men who are running the war have free access
to the
> natural resources, the stuff that goes into our cell
phones and
> computers, and that pays for their wars. So women pay
the highest
> price in that war.
>
> JUAN GONZALEZ: I'd like to ask you about one woman that
became the
> front page of Time magazine in August, Bibi Aisha, the
young Afghan
> woman who was pictured, her face mutilated, with the
headline "What
> Happens if We Leave Afghanistan." You've been
particularly critical of
> that story and how the media have manipulated it. Could
you talk about
> that?
>
> ANN JONES: I was very concerned about the exploitation
of that
> personal family tragedy in order to make a case for
keeping American
> troops in Afghanistan and continuing this war, in which
so many
> Afghans have suffered. Bibi Aisha's case was not
uncommon. Her
> particular mutilation has been her nose and ears being
cut off. There
> are four cases of it reported this year by the Afghan
Independent
> Human Rights Commission. This, after Americans have been
protecting
> Afghan women for eight or nine years in Afghanistan.
This happens to
> be the way some Pashtun families treat women in order to
keep them in
> servitude to the family. We are not going to change that
by the
> presence of troops, and we're not going to stop it by
the presence of
> troops.
>
> AMY GOODMAN: Can you tell us her story, though, and how
you feel it
> was misrepresented, in being on the cover, Time's case
for why the US
> is there?
>
> ANN JONES: Mm-hmm. Bibi Aisha ran away from her parents-
in-law's
> house. Her husband was absent elsewhere in doing some
kind of work or
> looking for work. She was treated as a servant and
physically abused
> all the time. She ran away. Her father-in-law caught up
with her and
> did this mutilation. The Time story amplifies that,
saying it was done
> under orders by Taliban commanders and so on. That is
not the story I
> heard from Bibi Aisha when I talked with her. But
>
> JUAN GONZALEZ: And you spoke to her before this Time
story had ever come out.
>
> ANN JONES: I spoke to her several weeks before, and
other journalists
> have spoken to her, as well, and have reported the
mutilation, but not
> this supposed instruction of the Taliban to do this. So
I think the
> story changed in some way. How that happened, I don't
know. This young
> woman was deeply traumatized, and we know that people in
that
> circumstance have selective memory or repressed memory,
and maybe it
> changed later. I don't know. But my quarrel is with the
news media
> that took that personal tragedy and used it for this
political
> manipulation. And even the story in that issue of Time
about what's
> going on in Afghanistan today was much more nuanced and
was warning
> against the possibility of women being sold out in
negotiations with
> the Taliban. That is a very real concern that we need to
be
> addressing, and that was completely ignored in the
attention paid to
> this particular horrifying photo.
>
> AMY GOODMAN: We're talking to Ann Jones. She has a new
book; it's
> called War Is Not Over When It's Over: Women Speak Out
from the Ruins
> of War. Can you talk about your camera project, giving
cameras to
> women to document war and the effects of it on their
lives?
>
> ANN JONES: Yes. Working with the International Rescue
Committee, we
> gave digital cameras to women and asked them to
photograph the
> blessings and the problems in their lives. It was really
a project to
> encourage them to begin to articulate their own
situation and speak up
> in their own villages and communities on behalf of their
own
> interests. And the women were amazing. They did
fantastic work. They
> spoke up very loudly in their own interests.
> And what they gave us, really, was blueprints for peace.
What they
> addressed were the problems of getting safe water,
getting safe access
> to their fields to work, getting education for their
children, getting
> healthcare, getting places for community members to
meet. In other
> words, the women are concerned about the future of their
families and
> their communities living a peaceful life. And this, it
seemed to me,
> was such important support for what the UN has been
saying for a
> decade now, that you will not get durable peace anywhere
in the world
> in the aftermath of conflict unless women are involved
every step of
> the way. And that's exactly what we are not seeing in
Afghanistan
> today.
>
> JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, you've been going back and forth
now since 2002
> to Afghanistan, so you've seen the war when it was
George Bush's war
> and now when it is Barack Obama's war. Have you seen any
difference in
> the way the war is being carried out on the ground?
>
> ANN JONES: Well, now American troops are much more
involved, of
> course, because, as we know, George Bush neglected the
Afghan war,
> busying himself elsewhere. So, American troops are much
more in
> evidence now, much more active, causing far more
civilian casualties.
> And since the Obama surge, if we can call it that, the
civilian
> casualties have gone up about 25 percent. Six thousand
were killed
> last year. The number is likely to be higher now.
Thousands more have
> been displaced, so that I think the civilian population
is suffering
> perhaps even more now than they did during the Bush
years. And
> certainly more and more Afghans outside the capital are
saying that
> conditions are worse for them now than they were before.
Within the
> capital, there is still an island of relative security,
although it's
> really a fortified city now, so that many within the
city are still
> arguing for the presence of American troops to protect
them. But I
> think when you go outside the city, you get a very
different story.
>
> AMY GOODMAN: Ann Jones, we want to thank you very much
for being with
> us, writer and photographer. Her new book is called War
Is Not Over
> When It's Over: Women Speak Out from the Ruins of War.
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Milis Wanita Muslimah
Membangun citra wanita muslimah dalam diri, keluarga, maupun masyarakat.
Twitter: http://twitter.com/wanita_muslimah
Situs Web: http://www.wanita-muslimah.com
ARSIP DISKUSI : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wanita-muslimah/messages
Kirim Posting mailto:wanita-muslimah@yahoogroups.com
Berhenti mailto:wanita-muslimah-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Milis Keluarga Sejahtera mailto:keluarga-sejahtera@yahoogroups.com
Milis Anak Muda Islam mailto:majelismuda@yahoogroups.com
Milis ini tidak menerima attachment.
0 comments:
Post a Comment