Sdr DWI...I told you before,Jilbab adalah ibadah KULIT
tidak penting...bukan INTI dari ajaran Islam.
You see...you still do not believe it as I told you
longtime ago, that hijab just Arab culture,not
Islamic teaching.DR Qurash Shihab juga berpendapat sama.
Umat Islam Indonnesia telah tertipu oleh ulama2
Arab kuno yg mengikuti bisikan Syaitan,
dan termasuk ulama2Indonesia yg belajar dgn nenek
moyang Arab yaitu Syaitan..
Look at ..negeri arab itu adalah padang Pasir
yang panas,kalau tidak ditutup kepala dan muka
maka pasir panas akan merusak kulit dan rambut
makanya ulama2 memerintahkan untuk menutup
semua kepala dan muka.bukan ajaran Islam.
Be smart !! wanita muslimah Indonesia.
Jangan mau di tipu oleh manusia2 yg bukan menerima
perintah dari ALLAH tapi dari nenek moyangnya, Devil.
Ulama2 Islam telah banyak tertipu dgn hadist2 palsu
rekayasa manusia yg tdk senang Islam maju..
maju dlm akhlaqnya dan maju ekonominya..
Akirnya umat Islam terbelakang dan miskin
Kalau di dikoreksi malah menentang dan marah
seperti anak2.
Pelajari kembali perbedaan2 antara REFORMER dgn
ulama2 Primitif Arab
40 perbedaan2 antara Progresive dan fundamentalis.kuno.
http://muslimbertaqwa.blogspot.com/2011/11/40-perbedaan2-islam-progressive-dan.html
salam
--- In wanita-muslimah@yahoogroups.com, Dwi Soegardi <soegardi@...> wrote:
>
> ==
> Berita dari Mesir pekan lalu, sebuah disertasi doktor bidang Syariah
> oleh Mustafa M Rashid
> dinyatakan lulus cum laude oleh Al-Azhar, menyatakan bahwa hijab bukan
> bagian dari agama.
> (al-hijab laysa min al-din)
>
> Silakan menyimak artikel asli dalam bahasa Arab dan di bawahnya adalah
> terjemahan dalam bahasa Inggris
> dari milis lain. Saya mencoba google translate tetapi hasilnya rancu
> dan tidak layak ditayangkan di sini.
>
> btw, rasanya ngga baru-baru amat argumen ini, mudah-mudahan ada
> informasi lebih lanjut.
>
> salam,
> ==
>
> http://www.elbashayer.com/news-192556.html
>
>
> ÇáÇÒåÑ íÄßÏ : ÇáÍÌÇÈ áíÓ ãä ÇáÏíä
>
> ÇáÎãíÓ 17 ãÇíæ 2012 12:20:02 ã
>
> ÃÎíÑÇ ÍÓã ÇáÇÒåÑ ãæÞÝå ..
> æÃÚáä ÕÑÇÍÉ Çä ÇáÍÌÇÈ áíÓ ãä ÇáÏíä Ýì ÔìÁ ..
>
> ãæÇÝÞÉ ÇáÇÒåÑ Úáì åÐÇ ÇáÑÃì ÌÇÁÊ Ýì ãäÍå ÏÑÌÉ ÇáÏßÊæÑÉ ááÔíÎ ãÕØÝì
> ãÍãÏ ÑÇÔÏ Ýí ÇáÔÑíÚÉ æÇáÞÇäæä ÈÊÞÏíÑ ÚÇã ÇãÊíÇÒ¡Ýì ÑÓÇáÉ ÞÇá ÇáÔíÎ
> ãÕØÝì ÝíåÇ Çä ÇáÍÌÇÈ áíÓ ÝÑíÖÉ ÇÓáÇãíÉ..
>
> æÇä ÊÝÓíÑ ÇáÇíÇÊ ÈãÚÒá Úä ÙÑæÝåÇ ÇáÊÇÑíÎíÉ¡ æÇÓÈÇÈ äÒæáåÇ ÞÏ ÇÏì Åáì
> Ýåã ãÛáæØ ÔÇÚ æÇäÊÔÑ ÈÔßá ßÈíÑ Íæá ãÇ íÓãì ÈÜ«ÇáÍÌÇÈ ÇáÇÓáÇãí!»¡
> æÇáãÑÇÏ Èå ÛØÇÁ ÇáÑÃÓ ÇáÐí áã íÐßÑ áÝÙå Ýí ÇáÞÑÂä ÇáßÑíã Úáì ÇáÇØáÇÞ
>
> ÇáÇ Çä ÇáÈÚÖ ÞÏ ÇÎÊÒá ãÞÇÕÏ ÇáÔÑíÚÉ ÇáÇÓáÇãíÉ æÕÍíÍ ÇáÊÝÓíÑ æÑÝÖ ÅÚãÇá
> ÇáÚÞá Ýí äÞáå æÊÝÓíÑå¡ æÃæÑÏ ÇáäÕæÕ Ýí ÛíÑ ãæÖÚåÇ æÝÓÑåÇ Úáì åæÇå¡
> ãÈÊÚÏÇ Úä ÇáãäåÌ ÇáÕÍíÍ Ýí ÇáÊÝÓíÑ æÇáÇÓÊÏáÇá ÇáÐí íÝÓÑ ÇáÂíÇÊ æÝÞÇ
> áÙÑæÝåÇ ÇáÊÇÑíÎíÉ æÊÈÚÇ áÃÓÈÇÈ äÒæáåÇ¡ ÅãÇ áÑÛÈÊåã æÞÕÏåã Çä íßæä
> ÇáÊÝÓíÑ åßÐÇ¡ æÇãÇ áÍÓä äíÊåã áÃä ÞÏÑÇÊåã ÇáÊÍáíáíÉ ÊÊæÞÝ ÅãßÇäÇÊ
> ÝåãåÇ ÚäÏ åÐÇ ÇáÍÏ áÚæÇÑ ÚÞáí Ãæ ÂÝÉ äÝÓíÉ.
>
>
> ÈÇÊÊ ãÓÃáÉ «ÇáÍÌÇÈ!» ÊÝÑÖ äÝÓåÇ Úáì ÇáÚÞá ÇáÇÓáÇãí æÛíÑ ÇáÇÓáÇãí¡
> æÇãÓÊ ãÞíÇÓÇ æÊÍÏíÏÇ áãÞÕÏ æãÚäì æØÈíÚÉ ÇáÏíä ÇáÇÓáÇãí Ýí äÙÑ ÛíÑ
> ÇáãÓáãíä ããÇ ÍÏÇ ÈÈÚÖ ÇáÏæá ÛíÑ ÇáÇÓáÇãíÉ Çáì ÇÚÊÈÇÑ «ÇáÍÌÇÈ!» ÔÚÇÑÇ
> ÓíÇÓíÇ íÄÏí Åáì ÇáÊÝÑÞÉ Èíä ÇáãæÇØäíä æÇáÊãííÒ Èíäåã¡ æÞÏ ÍÏËÊ
> ãÕÇÏãÇÊ¡ æÝÕá ãä ÇáÌÇãÚÇÊ æÇáæÙÇÆÝ ÈÓÈÈ ÊãÓß ÇáãÓáãÉ ÈÝåã ÎÇØÆ áãÇ
> íÓãì «ÇáÍÌÇÈ!»¡ æÊÍãíá ááÇÓáÇã ÈãÇ áã íÃÊ Èå ãä ÏÚæì Çäå ÝÑíÖÉ
> ÇÓáÇãíÉ.
>
> ÌÇÁÊ ÇÏáÉ ãä íÑæä ÝÑÖíÉ «ÇáÍÌÇÈ!» ãÊÎÈØÉ æÛíÑ ãÑÊÈØÉ¡ ãÑÉ ÈãÚäì
> ÇáÍÌÇÈ¡ æÊÇÑÉ ÈãÚäì ÇáÎãÇÑ¡ æÇÎÑì ÈãÚäì ÇáÌáÇÈíÈ¡ æåæ ãÇ íæÖÍ ÇÈÊÚÇÏåã
> Úä ÇáãÚäì ÇáÕÍíÍ ÇáÐí íÞÕÏæäå æåæ ÛØÇÁ ÇáÑÃÓ¡ æÇäåã íÑíÏæä ÇäÒÇá ÇáÍßã
> ÈÃí Ôßá áåæì ÚäÏåã¡ æÞÏ æÑÏ ÐßÑ «ÇáÍÌÇÈ!» Ýí ÇáÂíÉ ÑÞã (53) ãä ÓæÑÉ
> ÇáÇÍÒÇÈ¡ æÇáãÞÕæÏ Èå ÇáÍÇÆØ Ãæ ÇáÓÇÊÑ¡ æåæ ãÊÚáÞ ÈÃãåÇÊ ÇáãÄãäíä
> ÇáØÇåÑÇÊ ÇáãØåÑÇÊ ææÌæÈ æÖÚ ÓÇÊÑ Èíäåä æÈíä ÇáÑÌÇá ãä ÕÍÇÈÉ ÑÓæá Çááå
> Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã¡ ÇãÇ ÇáÇÓÊÏáÇá ÈÂíÉ ÇáÎãÇÑ ÇáÊí æÑÏÊ Ýí ÓæÑÉ ÇáäæÑ
> Ýí ÇáÂíÉ ÑÞã (31) Ýåæ ÃíÖÇ ÇÓÊÏáÇá ÈÇØá áÃä ÇáãÞÕæÏ ÈåÇ æÌæÈ ÓÊÑ ÇáäÍÑ
> æåæ ÇÚáì ÇáÕÏÑ æÓÊÑ ÇáÚäÞ ÇíÖÇ¡ æÚáÉ äÒæá Êáß ÇáÂíÉ ÇáßÑíãÉ¡ ÊÕÍíÍ
> æÊÚÏíá æÖÚ ÎÇØÆ ßÇä ÓÇÆÏÇ æÞÇÆãÇ æÞÊ äÒæáåÇ æåæ ßÔÝ ÕÏÑ ÇáãÑÃÉ æåí
> ÕæÑÉ íÑÝÖåÇ ÇáÇÓáÇã æãä Ëã ÞÕÏÊ ÇáÇíÉ ÊÛØíÉ ÇáÕÏÑ æáíÓ ÛØÇÁ ÇáÑÃÓ ßãÇ
> íÓãíå ÇáäÇÓ ÇáÂä «ÇáÍÌÇÈ!».
>
> ÇãÇ ÇáÇÓÊÏáÇá ÈÂíÉ ÇáÌáÇÈíÈ ÇáÊí æÑÏÊ Ýí ÓæÑÉ ÇáÇÍÒÇÈ Ýí ÇáÂíÉ ÑÞã
> (59)¡ ÝÅä ÓÈÈ äÒæá ÇáÂíÉ Çä ÚÇÏÉ ÇáäÓÇÁ æÞÊ ÇáÊäÒíá ßÇäÊ ßÔÝ æÌæååä
> ãËá ÇáÅãÇÁ Ãæ ÇáÌæÇÑí¡ ÝßÇä ÈÚÖ ÇáÝÌÇÑ íÓÊÑÞæä ÇáäÙÑ Åáì ÇáäÓÇÁ ÝäÒáÊ
> Êáß ÇáÂíÉ áÊÖÚ ÝÇÑÞÇ æÊãííÒÇ Èíä ÇáÍÑÇÆÑ æÇáÅãÇÁ ÇáÌæÇÑí ÍÊì áÇ ÊÊÃÐì
> ÇáÍÑÉ ÇáãÄãäÉ ÇáÚÝíÝÉ.
>
> æÇÎíÑÇ ÇÓÊÏáÇá ÇáÈÚÖ ÈÍÏíË ÃÓãÇÁ ÈäÊ ÇÈí ÈßÑ ÑÖí Çááå ÚäåãÇ ÚäÏãÇ ÏÎáÊ
> Úáì ÑÓæá Çááå Õáì Çááå Úáíå æÓáã ÝÃãÑåÇ ÈÃä áÇ ÊßÔÝ ÇáÇ Úä æÌååÇ
> æßÝíåÇ¡ ßÏáíá Úáì ÝÑÖíÉ «ÇáÍÌÇÈ!» Ãí ÛØÇÁ ÇáÑÃÓ¡ Ýåæ ÇÓÊÏáÇá áÇ íÚÊÏ
> Èå áÃä åÐÇ ÇáÍÏíË ãä ÇÍÇÏíË ÇáÂÍÇÏ¡ æáíÓ ãä ÇáÇÍÇÏíË ÇáãÊæÇÊÑÉ Ãæ
> ÇáãÊÕáÉ ÇáÓäÏ¡ áßäå ÍÏíË ÂÍÇÏ áã íÊÕá ÓäÏå ÈÇáÚÏæá ÇáÖÇÈØ
>
>
> Terjemahan ke dalam bahasa Inggris yang saya dapatkan dari milis lain:
>
>
>
> Finally al Azhar clarifies its position and announces that hijab has
> nothing to do with religion
>
> al Azhar's endorsed Sheikh Mustafa Mohamed Rashid's PhD thesis on
> Sharia and Law for which he obtained a grade of excellent, where he
> stated that hijab is not an Islamic requirement (fard), and that the
> interpretation (tafseer) of the verses (ayat) and the circumstances
> during which they appeared has led to the widespread misunderstanding
> about the so-called 'Islamic Hijab' denoting covering the head, of
> which there is absolutely no mention in the Quran.
>
> Yet some have misconstrued the intent and correct interpretation of
> the Sharia, refusing the logic and sequence of its appearance,
> abandoning the proper methods of citing and interpreting of the verses
> (ayat), their historical background and reason for them. They have
> done so either intentionally, or with good intention but with lack of
> the essential analytical savvy.
>
> This hijab issue imposed itself on the Islamic and non-Islamic psyche,
> and thus becoming the defining factor, meaning, and nature of the
> Islamic faith to non-Muslims, which led some non-Islamic nations to
> consider it a divisive political statement. In consequence to the
> resulting friction, some female students have been expelled from
> universities and jobs, only due to their adherence to this false
> belief, thereby attaching to Islam a non existent requirement.
>
> So inconsistent and misguided have the proofs of the supporters of the
> hijab theory been, that it would sometimes take the form of khimar or
> jalabeeb, which distanced them from what they meant by head cover,
> which is indicative of their restrictive set of mind.
>
> 'Hijab' was mentioned in verse (ayah) 53 of al AHzab, where it
> signifies 'wall' or 'what prevents view' and it was in regards to pure
> "ummuhat al mo'mineen" where a "hajib" is to be placed between them
> and any men.
>
> As for verse (ayah) 31 of Al Khimar - Sourrat al Noor, that is also a
> redundant claim, as the intent here is the cover of the breast and
> neck - the background here is the covering of the breast whose
> exposure is un-Islamic, and not what is now understood by hijab for
> the head.
>
> And in regards to the historical background of verse (ayah) 59 of
> Sourrat al AHzab was to distinguish between the pure and the
> promiscuous whores and slaves.
>
> Finally, in the mis-use of the Hadith about Asma'a, daughter of Abu
> Bakr, when she walked in on the prophet (pbuh)s gathering, and he
> ordered her to not expose her face or palms - this Hadith is not a
> binding Hadith, as it is one of al AHaad and not one of the
> consistent, or the connected confirmed.
>
Milis Wanita Muslimah
Membangun citra wanita muslimah dalam diri, keluarga, maupun masyarakat.
Twitter: http://twitter.com/wanita_muslimah
Situs Web: http://www.wanita-muslimah.com
ARSIP DISKUSI : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wanita-muslimah/messages
Kirim Posting mailto:wanita-muslimah@yahoogroups.com
Berhenti mailto:wanita-muslimah-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Milis Keluarga Sejahtera mailto:keluarga-sejahtera@yahoogroups.com
Milis Anak Muda Islam mailto:majelismuda@yahoogroups.com
Milis ini tidak menerima attachment.
0 comments:
Post a Comment